Wildlife photographers can have the camera triggered by movement in the shot.Īnother vouch of support for ML comes from users of Canon's lower end range. Astrophotographers can expose their photos for hours. Magic Lantern isn't the must-have that it was before, sure. However, it still shines brightly in the more niche sections of photography. This is a great example of Canon being left behind and ML along with it. This is only one case, though, and in fact, it may not spell the end of ML at all. Kraig Adams from Wedding Film School mentioned that he had issues with Magic Lantern corrupting his footage and has since found the Sony a7S to be the perfect replacement. Record voice tags for your images? Or triggering the shutter based on motion detection? It's all included. This alone makes it worth it for me. Maybe you want to take a photo without triggering the shutter? ML allows the camera to take silent photos. Being able to manually change the white balance on the fly saves me so much time. As an ML user, I myself would rather take the small risk in order to gain the extra features.
The ML Forums are filled with similar troubleshooting issues. Would you want buggy software to affect an important shoot? The Benefitsįor most ML users, the benefits outweigh the risk. If you remove the card too early, the camera will freeze and will drain the battery or even cause permanent damage." - Magic Lantern Wiki. For example, if you pull out the SD card too quickly after turning off your 600D, you run the risk of bricking it - avoidable, but certainly not reassuring. This doesn't mean that your camera will be bricked, but it comes with its limitations. Installing ML is done at the user's own risk, and this risk increases with the installation of nightly builds (untested versions). The software is open source, and there's no guarantee that it will work. Is the next generation of cameras missing out on ML? The Problem Not only is the 80D not officially supported, but the 70D is still a work in process. A consequence of this is that it isn't available for newer Canon cameras and may take a long time to become available. It allows for a host of extra features, ranging from a built-in intervalometer to HDR bracketing and beyond. The project is open source, and it encourages users to create elements of the package themselves. (I have also posted this in the "EOS rebel" forum.Magic Lantern (ML) is a software add-on for Canon cameras. (I need an answer by friday noon, otherwise don't bother replying.) If I believe the testimonies on that forum are reliable, I wouldn't hesitate. Experiences from more people (here) might boost your confidence or damage it so you'll be back to - it's your choice. Really, only you can decide if the risk is worth it. Is it safe? At least a few people from that link you posted say they've done it successfully. Īre there any potential problems for doing this? Is it safe? I would be glad to have your opinion.
I found this, which suggests I can downgrade my firmware to v1.0.2 (using this method) by using a download from here. Problem is, the Magic Lantern download for the 600d is only for firmware v1.0.2 (see here ), and my 600d is on v1.0.3.
I'm going for a weekend away this friday, and would like to install Magic Lantern on my Canon EOS 600d/t3i (I've got a few plans and it could come in handy).